Most recently, still wrapped up in a cheerful Christmas story, our blog in December 2022 focused on data protection in registration law – and on the fact that anyone can easily query the current registration address of another private individual without giving any reasons using the simple registration information service in accordance with Section 44 of the Federal Registration Act (BMG).
Criticism of the former Federal Data Protection Commissioner the registration information
The former Federal Data Protection Commissioner Peter Schaar also made a statement to MDR aktuell in this regard : He considers the possibility of being able to query the address data of any person at any time to be “no longer compatible with today’s understanding of data protection […]”, especially since this could also be done for abusive purposes.
According to a report by MDR, the Left Party in the Bundestag is proposing a kind of “reversal of the burden of proof” for journalists. Who are typically particularly vulnerable to doxxing: The brazil business fax list information block under Section 51 of. Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection Act (BMG), which under current law must be requested and justified by those affected, should not be the exception for them, but the rule. Peter Schaar also envisions an opt-out solution that would largely restore control over their reporting data to those affected.
Many possibilities for improvement are conceivable
For example, if a creditor wishes to assert claims against a debtor in court and requires a valid. Address for this purpose, the creditor might never obtain his rights if the how to write a job application email? debtor could simply object to the requested information. An obvious solution to this dilemma, however, would be for the court to determine the debtor’s registered address as part of the proceedings.
More difficult: Dealing with data misuse in authorities and public institutions
While the proposed restrictions may contribute to protecting data subjects in the private sphere, this is not the only context in which registration data is queried and used outside its intended purpose.
In a recent article, netzpolitik.org reports on the situation. Saxony-Anhalt as an example: Just as the Contribution Service receives registration data. In order to collect its fees, albania business directory various other public bodies also receive access to populatio. Register data via automated data queries. Whether the individuals involved are actually authorized to receive. The data in individual cases or truly need it to perform their duties is not verified. Nor is the group of individuals within the authorized authority who can actually access the data verified.
It is the responsibility of public bodies to handle the data they handle with care and to protect it from misusea. Rights and roles concept based on the need-to-know principle within the authorities authorized to access data. Logging and monitoring access can also be a proportionate measure if there is concrete suspicion of misuse of data.